BOEING

Emrooz sobh to rah ke radio gosh midadam, ye khanom zang zad be radio farda va darbare soaleshon sohbat kard ke aya obama monaseb bode va az in harfa..

Vaghti javabe khanomaro shenidam faghat mikhandidam poshte farmoon, migoft in jayezeh haghe ahmadinejad bode, ishon bayad mibord, hagh sehnas, rastgoo, rorast,komake mazlomine jahan, komake mazlomine ghaze va felestin ( sedash ham asabani bood )

Asemoon Abri

in khabar ro man jaei khondam mikhastam bedonam sehat dare?




This award is not simply about the efforts of my administration; it''''''''s about the courageous efforts of people around the world. And that''''''''s why this award must be shared with everyone who strives for justice and dignity; for the young woman who marches silently in the streets on behalf of her right to be heard, even in the face of beatings and bullets; for the leader imprisoned in her own home because she refuses to abandon her commitment to democracy

aryana1971

inam az tafsire Washington Post

Our Laureate: Neda of Iran
President Obama has won the Nobel Prize for Peace -- but that's not his fault.






Saturday, October 10, 2009

IT'S AN ODD Nobel Peace Prize that almost makes you embarrassed for the honoree. In blessing President Obama, the Nobel Committee intended to boost what it called his "extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples." A more suitable time for the prize would have been after those efforts had borne some fruit.

It is no criticism of Mr. Obama to note that, barely nine months into his presidency, his goals are still goals. His peace prize came in the same week that Washington was consumed by a divisive debate over how to win a war in Afghanistan; the Obama administration announced a probable delay in its plan to close the prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; and Israel's foreign minister told the world that the Middle East peace Mr. Obama has been promoting is not coming soon. The Nobel Committee's claim that Mr. Obama has "created a new climate in international politics" is about as realistic as last week's "Saturday Night Live" parody skewering the president for failing to deliver, already, on a series of campaign promises.

We understand how much Scandinavians and other Europeans welcomed the end of the Bush administration; in that sense, Mr. Obama's prize confirms that his ascension to the presidency has improved America's image in the world, or at least parts of it. But in offering this latest Euro-celebration of the 2008 election, the Norwegian committee has also demonstrated a certain cluelessness about America. If anything animates Mr. Obama's critics in this country, it is the impression that he is the focus of a global cult of personality. This prize, at this time, only feeds that impression, and thus does him no favors politically.

The Nobel Committee's decision is especially puzzling given that a better alternative was readily apparent. This year, hundreds of thousands of ordinary people in Iran braved ferocious official violence to demand their right to vote and to speak freely. Dozens were killed, thousands imprisoned. One of those killed was a young woman named Neda Agha-Soltan; her shooting by thugs working for the Islamist theocracy, captured on video, moved the world. A posthumous award for Neda, as the avatar of a democratic movement in Iran, would have recognized the sacrifices that movement has made and encouraged its struggle in a dark hour. Democracy in Iran would not only set a people free, it would also dramatically improve the chances for world peace, since the regime that murdered her is pursuing nuclear weapons in defiance of the international community.

Announcing Friday that he would accept the award, Mr. Obama graciously offered to share it with "the young woman who marches silently in the streets on behalf of her right to be heard even in the face of beatings and bullets." But the mere fact that he avoided mentioning either Neda's name or her country, presumably out of consideration for the Iranian regime with which he is attempting to negotiate, showed the tension that sometimes exists between "diplomacy and cooperation between peoples" on the one hand, and advocacy of human rights on the other. The Nobel Committee could have spared Mr. Obama this dilemma if it had given Neda the award instead of him.

__________________
darigh ast Iran ke ingoone Viran shavad

Gole_Orkide

Chandta Info Az Khabaraaye Norway :

Be dalile amniateshoon , baraa policehaayi ke gharare baraaye inkaar gozashte beshan un doro bare maraasem, 30 000 000 NOK ke mishe 3613364.86 Euros kharj mishe,...

Billitasham be harkasi nemifrooshan engari yani kheyli kamtar mishe adamaaye mamooli, chon ehtemale terroresh migan ziaade! felan man jaasho natunestam peyda konam, emtehanesho mikonim,..

__________________
ツ

Ferdos

http://www.cnn.com/video/?JSONLINK=/...bama.nobel.cnn

__________________

aryana1971

http://www.streem.us/assets/picture206945.jpg

__________________
darigh ast Iran ke ingoone Viran shavad

bellosimo

he doesnt deserve it ,it was rigged!

darvish

In bahale

__________________
I do love my Koala

Ferdos

Sounds like this Michael Savage guy is so pissed off of Obama winning the Noble peace price, because Bush didn't win the noble "war prize" . Last I heard was, Obama himself was surprised, and some of his own administration aren't happy, that he got the prize. The committee gave him more like a liability, than a prize.

Now war-monger Republicans have another reason to bash Obama.

__________________